The Messiah Will Not Arrive in Air Force One, Part I

We are in perilous times.  I am wrestling with how we, as Christians, should respond to the chaos that is gripping our country.  Even people who do not believe sense something is truly amiss. 

We have lost the art of public discourse.  We respond in tweets and postings that are monologues, not dialogues:  We want the other side to hear us.  Just us.  Then if someone does respond, we are offended and hunker down with even more vitriol.  So the cycle continues, leading to an eye for an eye mentality.  But as Gandhi observe, such a pursuit will lead to the whole world being blind.

We are blind now:  to each other, to finding common ground and to discussing our differences with respectful listening. 

Even the church has experienced stinging animosity from within its own walls as well as from the surrounding culture. 

How do we respond?

The chaos seems to be a free pass to bad behavior, even on the part of Christians.  Many years ago, I was talking with a neighbor of mine who was very calm and then as soon as Covid came up, his whole countenance changed and he grew sullen and angry and said he had "faith, not fear."

Fear does that to people, Christian or not.  When you feel that you have no real influence on the world around you, that things just happen and that you cannot trust other people to be dependable, fear creeps in and it is way too easy for us to lash out.

The Covid pandemic showed us just how fear transformed this country into picking sides, and glaring at those who took the side you didn't take.  People felt free to blurt out whatever they wanted to and expected people to listen and not react in a negative way, yet they equally felt they could attack anyone they disagreed with.  Covid showed us how deeply divided a nation we really are.  Now, the presidential election is ramping up the fear and people are lashing out again. 

But look at Jesus' choice of disciples.  He picked Simon the Zealot to follow Him.  We not told in the Gospels where or when He chose him, but clearly Jesus was making a point by including him.  The Zealots had legitimate complaints.  Their nation was no longer under Jewish control; worse, it was in the hands of pagans.  People who enjoyed watching people get torn apart by wild animals, have sex with male and female prostitutes, engaged in sex trafficking and slavery, conducted brutal wars and had little or no regard for the God of Israel.  Yes, there were God-fearing Romans (the centurion whose servant Jesus healed comes to mind) but the vast majority of them were completely removed from the value system of the Jewish people.

So, in the Zealots' view of the world, why not stick a knife into a Roman and start the insurrection that would kick the Romans out once and for all? 

Isn't God on our side?  This is His land, His people and He will honor the efforts of His patriots to uproot the poisonous weed that is the Romans!  

In fact, Rome had spread into all corners of Jewish society:  The Jewish leaders of the Temple had to work with them to maintain the system; the walls of the Fort Antonia were taller than the walls of the Temple, so the Romans soldiers could look down on (literally and metaphorically) what was going on in the Temple courts. 

The Romans used Jews to collect their taxes for them--Matthew was a testimony to that.  The people were barely getting by, and yet the Romans reached in and took their hard-earned money to do what?  Build more palaces, more temples, more roads, more entertainment venues, and all for what?  The glory of Rome! Romans went to those places, but Jews didn't and yet they helped pay for them.

Is Jesus somehow advocating the Zealots' agenda by including him as a disciple?  Or is He showing him there is another way?  The Zealots had grown impatient with God's seemingly inactivity with vindicating His people.  So, the Zealots were going to lead the charge and because they were the chosen people, God would step in and assist them against His enemies.  Many of the psalms talk about David's desire to have his enemies crushed and is calling upon God to come to his aid.

So, why not now! argued the Zealots.  Jesus' miracles were testimony to how God's power resided in this Man, and now the Warrior-Messiah was clearly in this world.  Simon got to follow Him!  So, Simon must have felt utter elation....finally, God's Anointed One was here, ready to overcome the Romans with His fire and thunder.  The Romans, as with any of God's enemies, wouldn't stand a chance.

Yet, that is not what Jesus did.  In fact, He allowed the Romans to crucify Him.

What?  

But Jesus knew that you can change kingdoms but without changed hearts, those kingdoms will descend into chaos and become just like the ones they replaced. In other words, any kingdom that is based on untransformed hearts will rule from the flesh:

"So I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh. For the flesh desires what is contrary to the Spirit, and the Spirit what is contrary to the flesh. They are in conflict with each other, so that you are not to do whatever you want. But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.  The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God."  (Gal. 5: 16-21).

But as Timothy Keller points out in his book, Encounters With Jesus, evil is not just the sum total of a fallen humanity's decisions. There is an evil presence that then magnifies, amplifies and encourages the sins of individuals, and then drives those decisions to deeper and more catastrophic results. 

That is why a political solution to our country's problems is so fraught with danger.  It's not just humans beings trying to work out solutions to problems and making mistakes in the process; it is our sin being amplified by the prince of this world that makes our solutions problematic.

That is why Jesus didn't become the Warrior-Messiah that the Zealots wanted;  He knew that He needed to die to set us free not from the clutches of a depraved government but from ourselves and from Satan's prowlings that augment our sin.

We are facing the same conundrum today.  We see a society that is hostile to Christian values and we are looking to leadership to change our country for the better.

Not unreasonable. 

But my question is this:  If we expect change from the top down, are we allowing the Holy Spirit to transform us on a daily basis, so we may be salt and light to a world that is decaying and descending into darkness? Are we actively growing, confessing, reconciling and seeking to build bridges with others or are we letting the culture so anger us that we lose our restraint and allow our flesh a full rein?

Are we expecting the Messiah to arrive in Air Force One? 

Or do we let Him arrive in our hearts each day to enact His will and His love in this world, through us and in us?