Context is everything when you study the Word. Let's put Micah in his context:
Micah prophesied during the reigns of the Judean kings Jotham (750–735 B.C.), Ahaz (735–715), and Hezekiah (715–687). This was about the same time as Hosea and Isaiah, though Micah may have served somewhat later. The length of Micah’s public activity may have been about 20 to 25 years. [1]I find it fascinating that God is speaking through Micah to both Samaria (northern kingdom) and Jerusalem (in the southern kingdom of Judah), extorting His people to turn away from sin and live.
Funny how, when we read Scripture, we read the words of a prophet and think, BAM! the words come true very quickly, with chaos and destruction raining down in a mighty and inexorable way. We think,
Wow, God didn't give them a chance, did He? His prophets speak and down comes judgment. God seems to be more into judgment than mercy and grace. But that's the Old Testament for you. God is angry and ready to let destruction happen, but in the New Testament, God is filled with love and mercy for all of us.
Not true.
First of all, the God of the OT is God the Father of Jesus in the NT. Would Jesus have taken this position of God being of a different mindset than the One He called, "Father"?
The NT wasn't even written until many years after He ascended to heaven; He read and used Scripture to illuminate all things He taught about God, mercy, judgement, compassion, justice and righteousness. The OT was the only scripture Jesus read; the God He read about was His Father and the One who sent Him to seek and save those who were lost.
Consider that Micah speaks for 20-25 years.
That is a long time to warn and invite repentance.
That is not God warning His people and then judging them in a heartbeat when they don't respond.
Let's look at the kings that Micah is engaged with, and maybe that will give us some context. Let's briefly look at Jotham.
According to 2 Chronicles 27:2:
OK. We have a good king of Judah, and one who remains loyal to God. But his people continue to engage in idolatry. Sadly, the king's example was not enough to remind the people that following and being obedient to Yahweh is what the covenant is all about and leads to a just society.
But 2 Kings 15:35 tells us why his example was not sufficient:
Justice is compromised here when we read these two simple but telling sentences.
If the leader is moral, sets a positive example and leads with justice and mercy that is born out of a character molded by a transcendent code of right and wrong, the people under him or her will benefit personally and societally.
If a leader fails to reform the society in which the people are spiraling down, by allowing them to access the very things that are destroying themselves and the nation, then that leader is being unjust.
You can be personally good but if you are watching others destroy themselves by engaging in dehumanizing and enslaving actions, you have perverted justice.
So, King Jotham fails the Just Leader Profile. Building a gate is not enough.
Despite Jotham’s godly example, his son Ahaz proved to be a wicked king. [2]
He followed the ways of the kings of Israel and even sacrificed his son in the fire, engaging in the detestable practices of the nations the Lord had driven out before the Israelites.
Finally, let's consider one more king who tried to turn back the tide: Hezekiah.
2 Kings 16:3 tells us the repugnant story:
Did Ahaz crave the popular support of his people? Did he want them to see him as part of their world, not standing aloof in some self-righteous-Yahweh-supporting way? Did he feel the same pull towards the gods and their demands, desiring the "power" they could give him, and considered the ways of the covenant outdated and ineffective?
Who knows? But he gave his people's actions respectability because he joined in:
Look at the King! He gets it! We like this guy! Yeah, he is picked by Yahweh, but we know where he gets his power from!
King Ahaz enters the Hall of Shame with flying colors.
2 Chronicles 29:2 says,
He did what was right in the eyes of the Lord, just as his father David had done.
Was Samaria watching this sad parade of the pendulum swing of the good/bad/good kings of Judah? More to the point, did they think,
Hey, despite all this, even to the point of hucking your kid into the fire--we do that too, you know--Yahweh didn't do anything! You'd think He would have rained fire and brimstone on Ahaz's head, but nope. Nothing. Oh well. Let's not worry about it. Let's not listen to that dope Micah.
Yahweh doesn't either care, or that prophet is making a bigger deal about what we do than even Yahweh does. He's letting Judah carry on, even to the point where Ahaz won a battle against his enemies! C'mon!
Micah keeps speaking.
The people keep sinning.
The kings keep going back and forth.
But, at the core of it all, Judah and Samaria perverted justice by not holding fast to the covenant. They may have seen God's "inaction" (but He was acting through His prophets) as a kind of rubber stamp of either approval or He was simply being indifferent.
Either way, the God of the OT was just in that He reminded them of what His covenant meant: by honoring Him, they honored each other.
The clock was ticking, and Micah, along with Isaiah and Amos [3], reminded the people:
If my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land. (2 Chronicles 7:14)
The opposite is equally true:
If my people, who are called by my name, do not humble themselves and do not pray and do not seek my face and refuse to turn from their wicked ways, then I will judge from heaven, and I will repudiate their their sin and will take away their land. (2 Chronicles 7:14--modified version)
Those words still ring true.
[1] https://www.gotquestions.org/when-was-Micah-written.html
[2] https://www.gotquestions.org/King-Ahaz.html
[3] https://learn.ligonier.org/articles/3-things-micah
No comments:
Post a Comment